<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Projected seeds, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.njhockey.org/2009/02/21/state-seeds-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.njhockey.org/2009/02/21/state-seeds-09/</link>
	<description>Jonathan Yardley on New Jersey high school ice hockey</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:27:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.njhockey.org/2009/02/21/state-seeds-09/comment-page-1/#comment-3464</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 19:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.njhockey.org/2009/02/21/state-seeds-09/#comment-3464</guid>
		<description>Well - my apologies to you Jon - Looks like the seeding commitee did the same and based a whole lot more on head-to-head than in the past. 

Best of luck to all teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; my apologies to you Jon &#8211; Looks like the seeding commitee did the same and based a whole lot more on head-to-head than in the past. </p>
<p>Best of luck to all teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.njhockey.org/2009/02/21/state-seeds-09/comment-page-1/#comment-3463</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.njhockey.org/2009/02/21/state-seeds-09/#comment-3463</guid>
		<description>Jon,

I think you based too much (at least in Private) on head to head and not entire body of work or how teams are playing as year winds down.  

SPP beat MB by 1 but MB has been more consistent throughout and looks better when considering common opponents. 
SJV vs MD - SJV won on scoreboard but were thoroughly outplayed and SJV is reeling right now.  
RBC also falling off as season winds down - beat ND awhile back but wouldn&#039;t right now. 
And PJ - if win vs SJV puts them above SJV and therefore above about 3 teams they don&#039;t belong above, why doesn&#039;t SA wins against SPP do a lot more for them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>I think you based too much (at least in Private) on head to head and not entire body of work or how teams are playing as year winds down.  </p>
<p>SPP beat MB by 1 but MB has been more consistent throughout and looks better when considering common opponents.<br />
SJV vs MD &#8211; SJV won on scoreboard but were thoroughly outplayed and SJV is reeling right now.<br />
RBC also falling off as season winds down &#8211; beat ND awhile back but wouldn&#8217;t right now.<br />
And PJ &#8211; if win vs SJV puts them above SJV and therefore above about 3 teams they don&#8217;t belong above, why doesn&#8217;t SA wins against SPP do a lot more for them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

